|
lightshiner4ubud (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This dude is full of shit. Fuck the irs! and paying taxes to these reptillian scumbags
crimberland (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
''those of us who demand services'' he said. Learn what services you really need to live free and give up the shitty GOV benefits. I dont want anything from these rat bastards.peace
RetSquid (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@biped19 WOW, you really are nuts. I don't work for anyone and am my 'entire side'.I think YOU work for the IRS and are trying to get people into trouble over their taxes.What kind of bonus do you get for each person you get to evade taxes?Do you get it before or after the conviction?
biped19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@RetSquid Yes it is. They are not anyone's "representatives." Once again you fail to see the facts of the situation, or pushing an agenda, hiding behind bad laws made by paid off politicians. You assume falsely that we have a representative government. How many illegal wars? How many millionaires in congress? How many bailouts? Right, checkmate. How many years have you been with the infernal revenue service?Btw, your "entire side" is by your logic is amoral. Please go away.
RetSquid (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@biped19 It is not my interpretation of anything, it's just the law. No moral argument is involved on my side. "WE the People"'s representatives passed the laws to impose the income tax.
biped19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Excellent points.What these traitorous fascist do not seem to understand is that just because something is a law does not make it just and good for we the people. This is the fatal flaw in their argument. The next flaw is an accounting of what these "lawful taxes" are being used for. END OF ARGUMENT. Everyone is understanding now that these taxes no not serve the interests of the tax payers, who are no longer represented by at least 2/3 of the government. fidzlefool uses circular logic.
biped19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
OK, & why couldn't they say this. Anyway, forgive me if I do not agree with your interpretation of these laws.Besides this "its just the law" is a flawed low morality argument. Just because "its the law" does not make it right. Period. Paragraph. You can read any "codes" until you are blue in the face, but it still does not justify taxing the American population into austerity for the benefit of the banking oligarchs & their perpetual wars. We the people have spoken, and reject these taxes.
RetSquid (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@fidzlefou 1) Common law only rules where there is no written law.2) In summary, because the manner in which plaintiffs name is spelled, printed, or punctuated on filings in this case does not, in the courts view, impact on the substance of the pleadings, the court denies plaintiffs motions to strike as meritless.Cris Timothy, Hillman v. Secretary of Treasury3) Nope, nothing there.Enjoy your ignorance.
fidzlefou (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
1) Clearly you don't know about the common law and where it applies to.2) shut up, try to Copyright it in caps and see what happens.3) See that red number upside down on the BC ? what could it mean ?Obviously you didnt listen the videos or did not understood them.You can reply again so have the last word, you clearly want to stay in the dark so ill stop commenting.
RetSquid (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@fidzlefou I did watch those videos, I also commented on them.1) Menard is Canadian, whatever he does has nothing to do with American law.2) Your name in capital letters has no meaning other that it is easier to read.3) I live too far away to get the original of my Birth Certificate, but I do have my children's originals. |
